Huh. No More $4.50 Coffee For Me.

This is not to say that my wife may not drag me into a Starbucks. But instead of taking the neutral stance of the past few years and leaving it to the observation of local laws, they’ve asked me not to come into their stores.

Please follow me on Twitter, and “Like” the Facebook author page. Don’t forget to subscribe (the box is on the right side of the page) to be eligible for free e-books and other benefits!

That’s too bad. I rather like the smoothies, my wife likes the hot chocolate. I’ve been known to munch a pastry or twelve on occasion.

This policy may change. I think the CEO worded his letter badly. I think what he meant to ask was that customers no longer carry a weapon openly into their stores. My opinion is that if you are allowed to carry an open carry is fine. I also realize that it freaks some people out to see a handgun on my hip. That’s why I don’t do it. Not because I can’t, but I stir up enough trouble most places without adding a firearm on display.

But the letter doesn’t say that – it says don’t come in armed unless you’re law enforcement. Not even if you’re the woman with the stalking ex-husband who carries a gun in her purse to protect herself from the psycho. (I know that woman – taught her to shoot.) Nor does it say, “You can carry concealed if legally allowed because nobody will get their shorts in a wad and we kind of like the Constitution as it is.” Nope, it says I should stay away if I’m carrying.

They’ll get their wish. I figure with the amount I spend there each year I’ll have enough for a new Ruger .45 in about 18 months. And I’ll still be drinking coffee and cocoa but in somebody different’s joint.

Starbucks couldn’t drive me away with the overpriced coffee, but telling me I’m not wanted in their store sealed the deal.

Mental Illness Is Not A Crime.

On Monday an evil man shot twelve people to death. Oooh, too harsh? How can I judge him? What gives me the right to call him evil?

I base that appellation on the fact that murder is evil.

I can hear it now – “But he was mentally Ill! He heard voices and had a history of disturbed behavior.”

Please follow me on Twitter, and “Like” the Facebook author page. Don’t forget to subscribe (the box is on the right side of the page) to be eligible for free e-books and other benefits!

That’s right. He did have a history of mental health problems. Just like millions of other Americans. Just like some of you reading this blog. Just like your husband, son, daughter, cousin, wife, mother, father, and kid brother. How many of them have engaged in mass murder?

The point here is the media is ready to blame the shooting on serious mental health problems and ignore the fact that perfectly rational people do essentially the same thing from time-to-time. Not all mass murder suspects have mental health problems. In fact, some of the most memorable ones in my lifetime have been judged perfectly sane in most aspects. Sociopaths, but functional and normal to all outward appearances. So what’s the special something that makes them “snap” and start burying bodies under the house, shooting people at work, and throwing bombs into Pizza Huts? I think it’s the presence of evil, not mental health problems.

Millions of Americans struggle with mental health issues every day. It’s a living Hell for them. Strong word, accurate description. They are in torment and pain from the illness. Yet they struggle successfully with controlling their actions. They get up and go to work. They provide comfort for others in volunteer roles. They worship next to you at your church and watch out for your kids at the swimming pool. How do they differ from us? They have an illness.

The mentally ill are not criminals, and should not be rounded up and “listed” in some central data base. I am genuinely disturbed (perhaps I’m mentally ill) over the rush to create a data base of everyone with serious psychiatric problems. It seems that many are willing to strip the mentally ill of their privacy, their constitutional rights, and their individuality in the rush to deal with the occasional evil person who lets loose on society. This is not the solution.

In the past five years 131 people were killed in mass shootings as listed by the Wall Street Journal (which are those which include 2 or more victims and get enough media sensation to make the list, generally public settings with lots of cameras.) There were about 17,000 homicide deaths during each of those years (using the high year as the average, as not all the statistics are available for the last two years) for a total of 85,000 deaths. So, if you double the 131 just to eliminate nit picking, we have 262 deaths from mass shootings out of 85,000 – which makes for .3% of all deaths by homicide. Another view is that we have lost 262 citizens out of 319 million due to mass shootings – .000008% of our population.

What percentage of these is acceptable? None. 0. Nada. All are a waste and a tragedy. But are we really ready to put tracking collars on people with a health problem for .000008% of our population killed? Especially when most of the deaths in that parade (I read about each incident while doing this post) were acts of evil, stupid, angry people and not the mentally ill? It’s even more ridiculous to try and make us all safe if you look at the weapons used in homicides – feet, knives, guns, blunt objects, narcotics, drowning, fire, and explosives. All of them have one thing in common – people. Evil taking hold of people. Because nowhere in that list is there a murder category listed as “mental illness.” No study, no statistical extract, nothing I could find blamed mental illness as a weapon of choice for murder.

People have been killing other people since Cain and Abel. No firearm involved there, just evil. John Wayne Gacy didn’t shoot any of his victims, nor did Richard Speck. Both, however were evil. The list is long and rather tedious of evil people who have killed others over the years. And while some of them were mentally ill, the number of people with a mental illness that haven’t so much as killed a baby bird is larger by a magnitude of orders.

Let’s all calm down and evaluate this rush to make everything in our little lives safe. It won’t be safe. Ever. That’s the nature of life. In the meantime we’re scaring tens of millions of citizens, coworkers, friends, and associates away from getting mental health treatment by virtue of this hysteria. Would you go to the doctor and have your arthritic fingers treated if it would result in you possibly losing your job, your driver’s license, your ability to hunt, your ability to take care of your own children, and your ability to defend yourself? Of course not. So why are we doing that to people with mental illness?

In general, the ones who perpetrate these crimes have a history of odd behavior and criminal activity in their past. They have disclosed to the police, a coworker, a boss, or their doctor that they fully intend to hurt someone and do it soon. I’m not talking about the “I’d like to throw that miserable creep out the window” type statements. I’m talking about the “I’m going to take a shotgun and kill every living soul in that classroom this coming month. I’ve not picked the day, but it’s coming” kind of statements. Those folks, and only those folks, should be evaluated by professionals for their own safety. But the 47 year old housewife with auditory hallucinations is another story. She knows they’re not real and fights them every day. She has a grip. Should we destroy her life and register her like a sex-offender? For what? Potential acts?

There is an issue with mental illness and the stigma of seeking treatment already. Let’s not drive our nation into an orgy of labeling people over a largely treatable disease. Instead, let’s work to identify the causes of the illness and treat it more effectively. Don’t stamp a scarlet letter “M” on those who suffer from mental illness. Stamp an “E” for evil on the acts of murderers instead. It’s the right thing to do.

Deep Breath – Ready? Let’s Talk Navy Yard Shooting And Keep It Calm.

Before we step even one inch into this topic, I’d like to offer my condolences to the victims in the shooting at the Washington Navy Yard. My mother (who is a kind and wonderful woman) sent me an email last night because members of my family were hurt. And the United States Navy is my family. I bleed Navy Blue when a sailor is wounded.

Please follow me on Twitter, and “Like” the Facebook author page. Don’t forget to subscribe (the box is on the right side of the page) to be eligible for free e-books and other benefits!

Now that the disclaimer is done, and I’ve plugged the whole subscription thing we can get down to the meat of this thing: It is criminally stupid that our military are not allowed to carry weapons on duty. Moreover, they ought to be required to carry a weapon, as they are targets of terrorists and the unhinged. It is craven to do anything else. And this was as true under President Ronald Reagan as it is today under President Barack Obama.

The problem is that if you have guns you have to train your people how to carry them in an office setting. Well, Duh. And that costs money. Money that could be spent on other things. General officers don’t like being responsible for budget items that recur and don’t show big ticket items. They don’t like accidents. If you have enough people carrying weapons all the time there will be accidents. Promise. So, to avoid accidents you take away the guns. Our military bases are the biggest gun-free zones in the nation. And that’s how you get a massacre like Monday’s at the Washington Navy Yard.

A little history is in order here, so indulge me.

I thought the United States Air Force took security more seriously than any other branch during my years of active duty. They had real people, with real weapons, with real ammunition, and would shoot you dead if you trifled with them. Round in the chamber. Do not approach the fence under penalty of death. Orders had been given and they’d execute them (and me) if boundaries were violated.

I admired that quite a bit. I knew where I stood with those guys (it was all guys at the time) and that was just fine.

A very close second were the United States Marines who guarded the compound where I worked when I arrived in Spain. Never a smile, no chit-chat. Show me the pass or get your – fill in the blank. This was reinforced by the machine gun nests on the roof of our building and the sneaky little band of trained killers that lurked outside the perimeter in a QRF (Quick Reaction Force) that was somewhere on base. Maybe nearby, maybe in the barracks. But I always had the feeling that they were under orders to wait for orders. Ready to do the job, hampered by authority. No round in the chamber, but nearby.

The Army was a distant third. It actually amused me to see the Military Police from Fort Ord cruise through the Defense Language Institute. They gave off a very distinct vibe – “We don’t care now, we didn’t care yesterday, and we won’t care tomorrow. We have donuts to eat.” I say that with only the snark that a former police officer can muster. Lax, slack, blind, and all sorts of other words pegged them into their little car which they never left. This is not to say that there weren’t some pretty good Army security troops out and about. I’m sure that the guys in Germany were deadly serious about their jobs. Soviets within mortar range can do that for your attention span. Al Stewart said, “It sharpens your perceptions when your back’s against the wall.” However, I know that live ammo wasn’t issued to most of them most of the time. One notch below the Marines in readiness. This was not the fault of the troops, but a political decision from on high.

A grindingly distant last place (because I never dealt with the Coast Guard they escape any scrutiny) was my beloved Navy. We were afraid of guns. Basic training included exactly 0 rounds fired by your genial host. My Company Commander knew I was able to handle a weapon and sent me to run errands on qualification day. That was a six hour romp at the range where recruits fired .22 pistols and were screamed at by the instructors. My Chief figured I’d be better off taking the morning and lounging at the exchange. Thank you, Chief – I had a lovely time. It was simply familiarization so that they wouldn’t shoot themselves in the foot the first time anyone handed them a pistol. In the 1984-1989 period the only time I saw sailors with live weapons loaded with ammunition it verified for me that nuclear weapons were somewhere in the area. That was the only reason for a regularly carried/displayed weapon. We did guard other things other places with weapons, but the average sailor during that period didn’t know squat about weapons. Ship’s reaction forces did carry weapons, but they had to muster and get them from a locker – and only in emergencies.

I fully realize that I’m an old fool and that the weapons training is much better now than it was back then. I was one of those rare birds that actually qualified expert with a pistol. Not many even could try – ammo was short and very few ranges available for the average sailor to qualify. Today’s sailors (and other branches) get good training if they are going to be at risk. But the political cowardice runs deep. Guards were the go to solution on Monday. They did their jobs bravely by all accounts. But what if every third or fourth sailor had to carry a weapon as part of the duty section? Would that have cut down on the number of deaths? I’d hope so.

Until the brass realizes that we have an obligation to let our troops protect themselves on base and at work, we make them all sitting ducks. The logic (run down above) always said that the threat was minimal and we could avoid trouble if we just didn’t issue weapons. That lead to stupid decisions during my time in Spain. The Marines were pulled off guard duty on our compound. We went from well trained and armed people to – (drum-roll, please) unarmed sailors with a long stick that had a wheeled mirror on it. Yes, indeed, from well armed to target in five minutes. Our compound was now guarded by untrained cryptologists who were told to check under vehicles for bombs.

I always wondered what we were supposed to do if we saw a bomb under a vehicle? Point the stick at the driver and demand they get out of the car or face a scratched paint job? My input on the topic was not welcomed with much humor. I distinctly remember being told to shut up and stand the watch or be written up. I lucked out – I went to sea instead. Pretty awful when vanishing for an indeterminate amount of time on a submarine made you feel safer than standing at the gate with the wheeled mirror stick.

We’re back to the wheeled mirror stick. Give our troops a fighting chance. Arm them today. They all signed up for this gig – let them have a fighting chance of seeing the next sunrise. Problems with that? Maybe – but if you can’t trust them with a weapon, why are they in the miltary?

That is all. Except to remind you to say a prayer for the survivors and the families of everyone in Washington. After all, they’re my family.

Sponsorship Sunday – Week Four Revisited – Blondine

During my trip to Haiti in February of 2013 I had the pleasure of getting to know the people of Healing Haiti. Part of their mission there is an orphanage known as Grace Village. It is my pleasure to present one of the children from Grace Village each week to my readership in the hope that you will take them into your heart and sponsor their care and education.

I’m repeating Blondine’s profile this week because all that’s lacking is a sponsor for her medical care. This young lady is so close to being “checked off” the list that I can sense it happening this week. Please prayerfully consider sponsoring her today.

This week’s child is:

Blondine:

Blondine

Blondine is a talented young lady who loves to sing and dance. Blondine’s favorite song is God is Able and other gospel songs. Blondine loves to spend her free time reading her bible and studying. Blondine hopes to be a doctor some day so she can help other people. Her favorite subjects, science and math, will serve her well as she continues her education. Blondine’s prayer request is that she is able to attend university so that she can become a doctor and help support her family.

Blondine came to Healing Haiti in July, 2008.  Blondine was abandoned along with her siblings Ronaldo, Laika, Edens and Bradley

Birth Info

  • Birthdate: December 21, 1995
  • Place of Birth: Port au Prince, Haiti

It is my hope that one of you will find your heart touched by this child and take up a bit of Christ’s work by sponsoring them for an extended period. My wife and I are sponsoring a pair of sisters and reading their letters today was a fantastic boost. Healing Haiti will do the right things for these children and I have full confidence in their work. I am not affiliated with them, they don’t endorse this blog, nothing like that at all. I just love kids (can’t be Santa and not love children) and know that Grace Village is the difference between life and death for many of these children. Please open your heart and prayerfully reflect on the opportunity God’s giving us to sponsor these children. Some of them have come out of slavery and have some of the toughest lives you could imagine prior to Grace Village.

Just click the link and it will take you directly to the page where you can sponsor this week’s child. And if God is particularly good and that child is sponsored when you get there, please grab another smiling face and change their life instead. My goal is to put Sponsorship Sunday out of business as quickly as possible and take that day off each week. Thank you. God bless you for your generosity.

Some of the finest people you’ll ever meet. The hands and feet of Christ.


September Eleventh Is Key To Understanding Syria And Benghazi.

Twelve years ago our nation’s course changed when Jihadists attacked our people. Not for the first, second, or third time in recent memory, but in the most notable attack of the string. No longer was it possible for the people of this country to ignore the savage behavior of Islam in regard to our form of society. We were rocked. Tears were shed. Mourning overwhelmed us.

We got over it, shrugged off our coat, grabbed our rifle, and kicked some butts. Our populace was largely united in pursuit of the animals who flew airplanes into buildings. We went after the Taliban Mullahs that hosted them. We ruled the skies and covered the ground in our righteous anger. When we finished with that nest of vipers we turned our attention to Saddam Hussein. He’d been in defiance of the cease-fire since just after Desert Storm ended. He had boasted to the world that he had a program to manufacture weapons of mass destruction. He had a history of using chemical weapons in vast quantities against Iran and his own people. The intelligence services of the western states agreed that he probably still had them, was manufacturing more, working on nuclear weapons, and his continued refusal to let us in to verify the status of those programs eventually brought us to war. Our strategic interests were on the line. Like it or not, oil from the Persian Gulf states fuels the world economy. Saddam was a proven threat to that oil supply. Congress approved of the attack and we went to war.

Did we do a good job? Outstanding job. Our military was superb. Our diplomats and what we did with the peace weren’t so outstanding. It should have been anticipated but it wasn’t. Good idea, great execution, poor follow-through. Lesson learned.

Things seemed to quiet down in the intervening years. They really hadn’t. The swine who’d attacked us on that September morning were still at it, still plotting, still laying the groundwork for more attacks, and getting ready to kill more Americans. The difference was that we’d managed to fix most of them in battle overseas in Iraq and Afghanistan. Killing jihadists there didn’t involve as many of our citizens as killing them here would. Our military is good at this stuff, grandmothers in Bend, Oregon aren’t so hot at dealing with improvised explosive devices.

The press managed to fall in line with the new administration in calling things by new names. It was a moment that George Orwell would have trembled to see. It was no longer a War on Terror, but an Overseas Contingency Operation. Nidal Hassan murdering his fellow soldiers at Fort Hood wasn’t a terrorist act, it was an act of Workplace Violence. And the changes in attitude, perception, and presentation picked up pace until a year ago on the anniversary of the attacks on September 11, 2001.

On this first anniversary of the attacks on our diplomatic personnel in Benghazi, Libya, it is my firm opinion that the people in leadership roles in this nation, both Republican and Democrat, have failed the populace and need to be censored or removed from office for malfeasance. It’s simple – we never leave our people behind. I was raised that way and I’m sickened and saddened that this act has been accepted by the public as tolerable. We left four to die in Benghazi, and a lot more to fight in solitude with no aid on the way. Never in my experience was that an alternative we would have embraced.

Any effort to seriously investigate the behavior of those involved, and those denied a chance to act, has been rebuffed by the administration. A cascading series of mistruths has issued forth from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue beginning with the explanation (proven to be false) that a video on youtube.com caused the attack. It went on downhill on the way to hearing former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton defying a committee of the Congress with the most obnoxious statement ever recorded within those halls, “What difference, at this point, does it make?”

Military personnel who had intimate knowledge of the affair have been shuffled about so as to be unavailable for interviews. Congress has been mislead as to the retirement status of those they sought to interview.

The whistleblowers have been besieged in their attempt to reveal the truth. Put in limbo and denied career advancement while those who were chastised for mishandling the events have been returned to their jobs with no official censure.

Four American men are dead. Our ambassador cruelly murdered. Our facility burned after being sacked. And one year later none of the people who led the attack have been “brought to justice.”

Our elected representatives have been almost as silent about this travesty as the press. Term limits may be the solution I seek, but it doesn’t seem strong enough.

The power brokers are not doing our business. Those in elected office work for us, not the other way around. They have forgotten who holds the power in this republic – the voters. The elected officials seem to have an agenda of their own. And the press is with them in this pursuit of – what? What exactly is the goal of lying to the American people and denying the four dead men justice?

One year later, just as this should probably be building to crescendo, we have our president leading the charge to back a faction in Syria that is intimately linked with both the attacks on 9-11-01 and with the attack on 9-11-12. We will become the tactical air force of Al Qaeda if Mr Obama has his way. The loyal opposition, in the form of John McCain, has taken to talking down to his constituents and being petulant when asked valid questions about the situation in Syria. Mr. McCain has a park bench with his name on it somewhere, I wish he’d go and occupy the thing.

My experience in the Middle East tells me that far more is going on here than we will ever know. I do know one thing – we’re being lied to in a rush away from responsibility and a rush toward war. As a nation we are perceived as weak and wandering. We’ve been taken in a game of backgammon by an optometrist and a former Colonel in the KGB. And they’re laughing at us while our President stomps his feet and fails to lead. He’s a reactor, not a leader. And those under him hold the public in contempt. We are not citizens of a republic any longer, we are subjects of an emperor. One crowned with a Peace Prize before accomplishing a thing to earn it.

It is not leadership to speak to the nation and blame your limited choices on George Bush. Listen carefully to the words of the President last night and you’ll see that it’s all the fault of Bush. I was appalled at the hubris of the man for couching his arguments in that mire. Leadership is clearly explaining your point based on its own merits. Instead I heard that chemical weapons are bad and killing children is bad. I’ll spot him that point. But how is it worse than killing children with bullets and bombs dropped from aircraft? How is a chemical weapon different when it’s used that way than any other munition?

A word about our threatened strikes against Syria is in order. We have been told as recently as the 10th of September, that the plan is for limited strikes to disable our “enemy” in their capacity to use chemical weapons. I’ve been gone a long time from the arena, and have no idea what Syria has in their inventory any longer. But the preferred method of delivery for chemical weaponry is via tubed weapons. Artillery, large mortars, rocket launchers (think MLRS or Stalin Organs) and not via aircraft or large missiles. I can hide a fairly large amount of ammunition and a sturdy artillery piece in my garage. Limited range, but it will sit comfortably in the stuccoed splendor that is my car’s home. In the warehouses I pass on the way to work every day you could hide thousands of weapons that would do this job. And yet we’re threatening to take them out?

I’d feel a lot better about Syria if the people we were proposing to aid weren’t the same ones killing Christians and shouting Allah Akbar under the black Al Qaeda flag. The same vermin who attacked the Twin Towers, The Pentagon, and tried to destroy the dome of the capitol building in Washington. The same ones who beat our ambassador, Chris Stevens, to death in Benghazi a year ago today while Barack Obama turned the crisis over to his minions and packed to bip off to Vegas for a rally. The same ones who will soon be attacking a target somewhere you have been or will be going in the United States. They will be back. They’ve been moving on to the next target since Mohammed led his first raid against the polytheists in Arabia.

Are those the allies we seek? Do we win anything by aiding them? Chemical weapons are nasty things, but call me skeptical – I’m still not convinced as to who used them in Syria, what the weapons were, and who was responsible for giving the orders. Most of the evidence is undoubtedly classified. But when the administration will not tell the truth about much of anything and stalls for time on every issue they run across, I’m unwilling to grant them any further tolerance. They must make a better case for their intended actions.

The time to come clean about Benghazi is long overdue. Don’t grant them a pass on it. Don’t let our military get involved in a war we cannot gain from in Syria. September 11th is a key to understanding our place in the world. We came back from an attack, cleaned up some unfinished business that threatened our economy and strategic interests, and then slid into being a reaction oriented state that denies the reality of our actions and our motivations. We’ve lost our compass heading and need to get it back. Don’t take on Jihadist forces as our allies.

Speak up, America. Demand answers. Demand the truth. Do not tolerate the lies any longer. It’s the least we can do if we are to honor our Constitution and the rights we’ve been given by God. I’m done turning rights over in the name of safety and security. I want the truth.